Bipartisan bill would prevent US from providing funds for military activities meant to support rebels in Syria; but would not prevent humanitarian aid or crucial intelligence gathering
Following news that President Obama will station ground troops in Syria, U.S. Senators Tom Udall (D-N.M.), Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) re-introduced their bipartisan legislation to prohibit the administration from using any funds on military and covert activities that would escalate U.S. involvement in the Syrian civil war.
The bill, which the three first introduced in June 2013, would ban the Department of Defense, the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Council, the National Security Agency and all other intelligence agencies from supporting directly or indirectly any military, paramilitary or covert operations in Syria. The legislation would not affect humanitarian aid or intelligence gathering efforts.
All three senators have strongly opposed deploying American troops to Syria. They also opposed the Pentagon’s failed $500 million program to train and equip Syrian rebels, which the administration ended earlier this month. Udall, Lee and Murphy had written a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry and CIA Director John Brennan, urging an end to the program. Udall and Murphy, both members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, voted in committee against authorizing the president to arm and train Syrian rebels. And, as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Lee authored an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act that would have prohibited this program.
“The deteriorating situation in Syria is tragic and chaotic, and while we should help our allies defeat ISIL, we cannot take steps that could lead to another war in the Middle East,” Udall said. “We introduced this bill two years ago to place a check on the president’s unilateral decision to arm the rebels, while still preserving humanitarian aid and assistance to the Syrian people. Today, the situation is vastly worse, and we now have U.S. boots on the ground without congressional authorization. We’re re-introducing the bill to prevent further escalation that pulls the United States deeper into the civil war. Not only are U.S. troops in danger from the very weapons we provided — under the failed train and equip program — to militant groups that are now affiliated with al Qaeda or other jihadist groups, we are on shaky legal ground under both the War Powers Act and international law. We have not been invited by Syria, as we have in Iraq, to provide support for groups opposed to ISIL. I support the president’s effort to find a diplomatic and political solution, but we also need to reevaluate our strategy in the region in order to continue to degrade ISIL without risking American involvement in a complex civil war with multiple armed forces hostile to U.S. interests.”
“The White House’s decision to put boots on the ground is just the latest dangerous escalation of our nation’s involvement in Syria,” Lee said. “Until Congress grants President Obama the proper authorization to conduct military action in that country, this legislation would help limit what has increasingly become an unauthorized war.”
“For nearly two years, I’ve raised concerns about the potential for the Syrian Opposition to coordinate with and provide American weapons to offshoots of al Qaeda – concerns that have, unfortunately, been borne out on the ground. After the administration’s troop announcement last week, I’m even more concerned that our policy is putting the United States on a potentially dangerous downward slope into a civil war with no end in sight,” said Murphy. “Our mission must be to degrade ISIL through airstrikes and special operations, stand up an Iraqi fighting force, and step up our response to the humanitarian crisis. We cannot allow ourselves to get bogged down in another shortsighted ground war that risks arming our enemies.”